Science & Technology

Does artificial intelligence make people less capable of sound judgement?

A programme on SWR on 1 November 2026 discussed whether the routine use of artificial intelligence weakens learning and judgement skills. Education experts are calling for clearer teaching guidelines and greater media literacy in schools.

Briefing

On 1 November 2026, the Südwestrundfunk discussed the proposition in a programme that artificial intelligence could undermine certain human judgement skills when used routinely. The presenter and the feature on the SWR website linked experiences from debates, philosophical perspectives and educational demands with references to empirical studies, some of which show that young people sometimes perceive AI applications as more credible or “cleverer” than teachers. According to education experts such perceptions can reduce opportunities to practise critical thinking and problem-solving.

Experts drew three main demands from the discussions: first, stronger integration of digital and media education skills into curricula; second, the use of generative models in teaching and professional development, supported by sound educational guidance; and third, clear transparency and liability rules for systems that support editorial, legal or learning-related decisions. Representatives from Privacy, technology assessment and education also warned against polarising public debate: a careful distinction must be made between justified caution and alarmist exaggeration.

The feature places the programme within a broader public debate in Germany that has been under way since spring 2026, in which the media, academia and politicians have repeatedly called for regulation and state funding for centres of expertise. The feature announces no specific political decisions; it offers recommendations and calls for further, longer-term studies into how regular AI use affects learning, judgement and social processes of understanding.

Artificial intelligence offers useful tools, but using them without guidance can displace learning opportunities. Education and policymakers must regulate the conditions of use so that efficiency gains do not come at the expense of sound judgement and society’s ability to debate. Long-term empirical studies are needed to reliably establish any potential harm to learning processes.

Editor: Mira Cadena (Article created with AI assistance).

Sources